USADA v LA Coutroom Drama

Those that believe there’s a vast doping conspiracy will see another plot twist in the Friday afternoon USADA v LA courtroom drama yesterday. The UCI filed to take the case over, LA’s team missed a deadline, and the Judge refused to grant an extension.

There’s much at stake, besides Lance’s legacy, and the UCI is defending him with words right out of Robert Luskin’s mouth. The USADA responds with

That’s like the fox guarding the henhouse

and in the NY Daily News report see what we’ve all heard about for years, that Lance paid the UCI 150K for “doping programs.” Also from the AP, this quote from the 07 report on doping in baseball by Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell

By our count, of the 21 podium finishers at the Tour de France during the period from 1999-2005, only a single rider other than Mr. Armstrong was not implicated in doping by a subsequent investigation. Yet, only a single one of these riders had a positive test with the UCI.

In other words, the UCI is enmeshed in doping, possibly complicit, and whatever you think of Lance and doping, they should not take over the case. The sport is ineffective at policing itself.

For more coverage see the NYT’s recap from Juliet Macur and legal analysis from Laszlo and Associates.



2 Comments

Unreal. The only possible upside of this move of theirs is that it might help to expose the UCI for the dope-hiding company it is and help bring an end to the horrible rule of these ass clowns.

Ask Landis, Hamilton and all the other athletes if their legal teams tried this novel legal approach of challenging the constitutionality of a governing body. If this becomes case law, then all those athletes that have lost titles been banned, get their cases overturned, right?

To comment

Or with us.





Advertise here

About this Entry

Vino’s Tarmac SL4 was the previous entry in this blog.

A Day with the Courage Classic 2012 is the next one.

Find more recent content on our home page and archives.

Latest Photos

About Bike Hugger