Mavic Doesn’t Give a Shit!

Those were my exact words I said while face to face with the Mavic Tech representative at the last Seattle Bike Expo. I could tell by the scowl on his face that the conversation was about to come off the rails, but I wasn’t trying to be antagonistic. I was merely stating the truth, which is that Mavic as a company doesn’t cater to anyone other than the racer or wannabe. Long gone are the days when Mavic shared in the French cyclotouriste tradition of sturdy yet light touring product. Sure the A719 is a great touring rim, double-eyelet with durable, long-wearing sidewalls, but they’ve got nothing between a 565gr rim like that and the 435gr Open Pro. The cycling market could do with a modern MA40 rim. But Mavic has already become convinced that the real money is selling complete wheel “systems” and accessories. Still, though they practically invented the market for wheel systems, Mavic has a penchant for ignoring the direction of the cycling market.

The exact sticking point I had is that while much revered Ksyrium series of wheels had been a great seller for my company, I really wished that Mavic would either sell a separate, conventional hub (like a 32H or 36H) or a wheel system that I could sell to sport-tourers or clydesdale-category cyclists. I said that if such a wheelset existed from Mavic, I could easily sell it at the $1000 price point. His response was, “Why don’t you just sell them Ksyrium SLs?”

Really, mate? Listen, I admit that Ksyrium SL wheelsets, with their “Zircalloy” aluminium spokes, don’t fail at nearly the rate that they did in the early generations, but nobody trusts 18-20 alloy spokes as much as 32-36 stainless steel spokes per wheel when long distance touring. In many environments, the alloy nipples will seize to the alloy spoke and rims within a couple seasons. The Ksyrium rims are too narrow to ideally mount tires bigger than 28-32mm. I also said that the discontinuation of ceramic coated rims in the Open Pro class and touring rim class wasn’t going to be filled by wheel systems using Exalith surface treatment…if those wheel systems cost $2000 or more. Mavic wants you to believe that their Ksyrium “multi-purpose” wheel systems can be all things to all riders, and that is just not so. I could see it was a lost cause to jam any feedback up the command chain, but for the 2013 model year Mavic attempts to force product managers and consumers to eat an even less palatable marketing ploy: tyres.

Mavic Yksion Pro PowerLink

That’s right. All Mavic road wheel systems are sold with tyres now. Last year Mavic rolled out their new line of tyres, clincher and tubular. They all have absurd names like Yksion and Aksion, and they are manufactured in Asia (as are most tyres, admittedly). I have ridden the Yksion GripLink (front) and Yksion PowerLink (rear), and I have to say that they were decent tyres. They rolled fast, gripped ok in the turns, but they seemed to be vulnerable to cuts, perhaps even more so than the reputably fragile Michelin Pro 3. Mavic claimed to have spent 3-4yrs developing the tyre line when they introduced it, and that seemed plausible to me. Many companies work with a 3 yr product cycle; so what? But one year after intro they replaced the Yksion tyres with Yksion Pro versions. They spend years developing a product and then replace it after one year? That doesn’t sound like they had a lot of confidence in it. And how are the new Yksion Pro tyres? Well, they’re supposed to be lighter, but that may be because the 23mm version actually measures just 21mm. And if anything they seem to be even more fragile. So they’re throw away tyres, why should you care? Because along with the tyres, now in 2013 the price of Ksyrium Elite wheels jumps from $680 to $800. Sure, some of that might be the inexorable upward march of retail prices, but a good chunk is supposed to be those shitty tyres.

So now not only does one wheel type suit every rider, but one tyre does the same? That’s bullshit. I don’t care if the entry level Aksium wheelset comes with shite tyres; those wheels are really just meant for the OEM market anyways. But not for wheels at the Ksyrium Elite and SL level or above.

Recently, the market for performance rims has begun moving away from the 25 year old trend of skinny rims (~19-20mm) and moving back to 22-23mm as a clincher rim standard. Hed, Zipp, and other rim brands have demonstrated that the wider rims better support the tyre carcass, prevent the sidewalls from squishing during cornering. Further, the wider rim expands the effective width of the tyre, giving more volume for a better ride and lower rolling resistance (wider tyres in general having been comprehensively tested as having lower resistance than skinny). Mavic has nothing to offer like this.

In the realm of aero rims/wheel systems, wide toroid shape rims have taken over for a different reason. Current aero design theory acknowledges sidewinds play a much greater role than originally acknowledged. The toroid shape scores better at greater yaw angles than the traditional teardrop shapes. Mavic has only just gotten onto revamping their aero wheel systems with the new Cosmic Carbone 80. Here I will admit that Mavic’s claim of integrating the tyre into the wheel system seems plausible because an 80mm deep aero wheel is decidedly single purpose. A tyre that blends into the rim should decrease aerodynamic drag, to perhaps some small extent. But in every other situation, Mavic’s claim of tyre integration is just marketing hokum that they plan on ramming down your throat.


Word!! I used to be a Mavic man. They were generous sponsors of a juniors cycling team I wrenched for and I even worked a few events with uber mechanic Chris Clinton and their Service Course. These days I look at their stuff and I only see gear for racers and posers (mostly the later).

I’d love to see them return to making hubs though I think the boat has already sailed on that one. DT, Shimano and Chris King have that market pretty well covered and it’s hard to imagine what Mavic could bring to the party.

Wheel sets are a different matter, especially below the top end. Most companies just try to trickle down their racing wheels to lower price points. That’s fine if you’re just some poser who thinks a set of aero wheels will actually make them faster in their next century but pointless if you’ve been cycling long enough to realize what a crock that is. Those wheels are usually quite a bit heavier than a more conventional wheel, not as durable, and often harsher riding. If you want a durable, comfortable set of wheels at a reasonable price you’re going to need to lace them up yourself or have a shop do it for you. Nothing wrong with that but it limits your options. Personally, I’d love to see Mavic bring back something like the Classics line but with a wider rim (and might as well make it disc compatible since that’s the direction things are headed). This would be a great wheel for everyday riders, people who put a premium on durability, and also for ‘cross.

On this topic too I’ve got sets of Mark’s Hevics…where he rebuilds the Krysium Elite hubs on Hed rims. Love em. Also, absolutely unexpectedly great wheel for Cross is the Krysium with other unpronounceable words. This one is carbon with ceramic rim surface that buzzsaws pads. The wagon wheel design works in CX, but you’d not know that unless the rep told you.

Similar phenomenon for mountain bikers with Mavic regarding 650B/27.5”:
This year Mavic proudly announced, that they have adjusted most of their numerous mountain bike wheelsets for 29ers now - well, about 2 to 3 years late, I’d like to add. 650B is not in Mavic’s pipeline for the moment.
The market share of Mavic rims for OE-applications with other hubs has been decreasing sharply in recent years even in Europe. Too bad, I still use good ol’ 521 rims on two bikes, even if they are not disc-specific. And I would really like to see Mavic revamping their rim offering, giving wheel builders more choices again.

But I also have had this impression of “well, they don’t seem to give a shit about that market, it’s all wheel systems”. Too bad.

Thanks for posting this.  I too am unamused with Mavic’s low-spoke-count-only built wheel offerings and especially unhappy with their tires being a part of the deal.

For commuters and touring cyclists hand-built wheels with 32+ spokes are always going to do better than pre-built wheelsets. Cheaper, more durable, and more maintainable. Shimano XT or 105 hubs and A719 or XM719 rims are a really solid combo. If you want to go fancy on hubs than Chris King or Paul are probably the way to go and Velocity and H+Son both make good rims. Also, the possibility of using a Alfine 11 or Rohloff hub in the back and a dyno hub like a Schmidt SON up front makes the prospect of buying prebuilt wheelsets even less appealing.

For non-racing cyclists weight isn’t necessarily a non-issue, but a couple hundred grams in one direction or the other on the bike is going to make less of an impact if you’re carrying around even light commuting gear, never mind touring gear.

Have toured on a mid-weight touring bike, and a heavy weight fully loaded bike (a Surly Big Dummy with full camping gear for 2 people), I can honestly say that how I packed made WAY more difference than the weight of the bike. Extra money is better spent on lighter camping gear than a lighter bike (on my most recent tour I ditched a bunch of weight with an upgraded sleeping bag and by leaving the camp stove at home).


something like this wheel?  :

hot-rodding mavic hubs into wider rims is my specialty. i just wish i could buy that for my customers directly from mavic.


velocity & h+son make good rims, but quality-wise neither is a match for mavic.  however both those brands are far more responsive to the market.  i feel that mavic’s alloys in their higher grade rims (eg not the open sport) is better than others and/or the A719 & Open Pro have thicker sidewalls than Velocity, DT, etc because the mavic product lasts more seasons in the rain and grit.  in terms of precision of extrusion and joining, i’m never seen hoops as consistently even as Hed Belgian rims, but they’re expensive and no longer lasting for sidewalls compared to DT etc.  h+son’s “archetype” rim is a near clone but the ones i’ve seen so far aren’t anywhere near as precise. they’re not bad, but they’re not a pleasure to build either.


I don’t know why your so upset about this.  Mavic has made a conscience decision to move away from the traditional build wheel market.  So what? There are a hundred other companies that make products to fit yours needs.  They are after the smaller by unit volume market of racers and posers, that makes up nearly 60% the revenue in cycling.

Advertise here

About this Entry

Syntace Flatforce Stem: Maximum Slammage!! was the previous entry in this blog.

The Best and Worst Times at Steilacoom is the next one.

Find more recent content on our home page and archives.

About Bike Hugger